plain-prompt
Review a firewall change safely
Assess management access, rule ownership, ordering, rollback, and verification.
- Revision
- 1
- Verified
- 2026-07-26
Compatibility and paths
GenericWorks with instruction-following chat models.
ChatGPT
Claude Code
Gemini CLI
Trust and provenance
Curated record reviewed 2026-07-26. Results still depend on the supplied context and target environment.
Fill variables
Values stay in this browser tab and are not stored.
Generated asset2 required field(s) must be completed
Objective: Find lockout and exposure risks before a ruleset change.
Context: Require console access and a saved ruleset for disruptive changes.
Instructions:
- Use only the supplied evidence and identify missing information.
- Lead with the finding, confidence, and one safe next action.
- Put read-only checks before mutations and include a stop condition.
- Never request or reproduce secrets, credentials, or private keys.
User request:
Platform/topology:
{{environment}}
Current and proposed rules:
{{evidence}}
Perform a safety review.
Required output:
- Finding
- Evidence
- Confidence
- Safe next check
- Stop conditionReal example
Input
Proposed: default drop input; allow tcp dport 443; administrator connects over SSH/22 from VPN
Expected result
Blocker: the proposal omits the current SSH management path. Add a source-restricted management rule, validate syntax, save rollback state, and keep a second session before applying.